RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Identifying thrombus formation in Fontan circulation has been highly variable, with reports between 17 and 33%. Initially, thrombus detection was mainly done through echocardiograms. Delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI is emerging as a more effective imaging technique for thrombus identification. This study aims to determine the prevalence of occult cardiac thrombosis in patients undergoing clinically indicated cardiac MRI. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children and adults in the Duke University Hospital Fontan registry who underwent delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI. Individuals were excluded if they never received a delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI or had insufficient data. Demographic characteristics, native heart anatomy, cardiac MRI measurements, and thromboembolic events were collected for all patients. RESULTS: In total, 119 unique individuals met inclusion criteria with a total of 171 scans. The median age at Fontan procedure was 3 (interquartile range 1, 4) years. The majority of patients had dominant systemic right ventricle. Cardiac function was relatively unchanged from the first cardiac MRI to the third cardiac MRI. While 36.4% had a thrombotic event by history, only 0.5% (1 patient) had an intracardiac thrombus detected by delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous echocardiographic reports of high prevalence of occult thrombosis in patients with Fontan circulation, we found very low prevalence using delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI. As more individuals are reaching adulthood after requiring early Fontan procedures in childhood, further work is needed to develop thrombus-screening protocols as a part of anticoagulation management.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine changes in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2008 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The design of the study included cohort of 19,715 infants born between 220/7 and 266/7 weeks' gestation from 213 NICUs. A nonparametric trend test evaluated indomethacin prophylaxis and the percentage of sites using any prophylaxis over time. We evaluated the prevalence of indomethacin prophylaxis by the center and the correlation between indomethacin prophylaxis and severe intraventricular hemorrhage prevalence among 12 centers with the largest relative change in indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence. RESULTS: In total, 16% of infants received indomethacin prophylaxis. The use of indomethacin prophylaxis did not significantly decrease between 2008 and 2018 but it significantly decreased between 2014 and 2018 (p = 0.046). Among 74 centers with ≥10 infants included, 20% increased the use of indomethacin prophylaxis, while 57% decreased the use over the study period. Of the 12 centers with the largest relative change in indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence, 50% showed an inverse correlation between indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence and severe intraventricular hemorrhage, while 50% showed a positive correlation. CONCLUSION: Receipt of indomethacin prophylaxis remained similar until 2014, decreased from 2014 to 2018, and varied by the center.Key Points · The receipt of indomethacin prophylaxis decreased over time.. · Center change in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis does not correlate with the center prevalence of IVH.. · Variability in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis across centers persists..
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine changes in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2008 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The design of the study included cohort of 19,715 infants born between 220/7 and 266/7 weeks' gestation from 213 NICUs. A nonparametric trend test evaluated indomethacin prophylaxis and the percentage of sites using any prophylaxis over time. We evaluated the prevalence of indomethacin prophylaxis by the center and the correlation between indomethacin prophylaxis and severe intraventricular hemorrhage prevalence among 12 centers with the largest relative change in indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence. RESULTS: In total, 16% of infants received indomethacin prophylaxis. The use of indomethacin prophylaxis did not significantly decrease between 2008 and 2018 but it significantly decreased between 2014 and 2018 (p = 0.046). Among 74 centers with ≥10 infants included, 20% increased the use of indomethacin prophylaxis, while 57% decreased the use over the study period. Of the 12 centers with the largest relative change in indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence, 50% showed an inverse correlation between indomethacin prophylaxis prevalence and severe intraventricular hemorrhage, while 50% showed a positive correlation. CONCLUSION: Receipt of indomethacin prophylaxis remained similar until 2014, decreased from 2014 to 2018, and varied by the center.Key Points · The receipt of indomethacin prophylaxis decreased over time.. · Center change in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis does not correlate with the center prevalence of IVH.. · Variability in the use of indomethacin prophylaxis across centers persists..
